Columnists
Turkey’s Real Export Problem: The Product or the Perception?
Harun Yazici | Editor in Chief, trbusiness.de
Discussions about Turkey’s export performance tend to focus on value added and product quality. These issues are certainly important. Yet the decisive factor is often overlooked. In my view, Turkey’s core export problem is not, as commonly assumed, the quality of its products, but how those products are perceived.
I do not believe Turkey has a production problem. Today, the country is capable of manufacturing to European standards across a wide range of sectors—from automotive components and home appliances to textiles, machinery, food products, and even the defense industry. In several of these fields, Turkey enjoys clear competitive advantages in quality, flexibility, and speed of delivery. Despite this, Turkish products in international markets are often positioned not as the preferred choice, but merely as an alternative.
This is precisely where the real problem begins.
Products Exist, Positioning Does Not
Competition in international markets is not driven by products alone. A product may secure entry, but what ultimately creates differentiation is the narrative in which that product is presented. For many years, Turkish exporters gained market share by offering solid quality at competitive prices. However, this approach failed to generate a lasting perception.
In many markets, Turkey is still viewed through a familiar lens: cheap to produce, fast to deliver, but risky in the long term. Economic volatility, frequently changing rules, limited predictability, and weak institutional communication have reinforced this image. As a result, Turkish companies are forced to prove their quality every time they come to the table, while firms from certain other countries begin negotiations with an implicit level of trust.
Is Competing on Price Really an Advantage?
For a long time, Turkey’s export growth was driven primarily by price advantages. In the short term, this delivered volume. In the long run, however, it produced three serious consequences. First, branding was pushed into the background. Second, profit margins remained structurally low. Third—and perhaps most critically—Turkey never fully secured a position as an indispensable supplier.
MY OTHER ARTICLES
Germany’s Biggest Integration Test: Waiting
Markets won on price are easily lost when prices change. Global crises, exchange-rate volatility, or the emergence of a cheaper producer elsewhere can quickly push Turkish firms out of the equation. This is not a problem of product quality; it is a problem of positioning.
Perception Is Not Only a Government Issue
Perception problems are often attributed to public policy. Undoubtedly, macroeconomic stability, legal certainty, and predictability are core responsibilities of the state. Yet reducing export perception solely to these factors overlooks the role of the business community.
A significant number of Turkish companies still struggle to tell their own story. Trade fairs are heavily sales-driven, corporate communication is weak, and senior executives lack sufficient visibility on the international stage. The reflexive belief that “we are already good enough” often prevents a clear understanding of how the outside world actually sees them.
Perception, however, is built not only on product quality, but on consistency, communication, and a credible long-term stance.
There is another reality that deserves emphasis. We are living in an era in which perception and reality have become deeply intertwined—sometimes to the point where perception overtakes reality. In the age of social media, a carefully staged, context-free video can be accepted as “truth” within hours. In such an environment, it is no longer sufficient for countries, brands, or companies to be good; they must also communicate that goodness clearly, consistently, and convincingly.
Exporting Trust, Not Just Products
If Turkey is to move into a higher league of export performance, it must first ask itself a fundamental question: What are we really selling—products, or trust?
Instead of being seen as a low-cost producer, Turkey needs to be perceived as a reliable solutions partner; instead of a flexible supplier, as a strategic business partner. Achieving this goes beyond the efforts of individual firms. It requires a shared language, a shared posture, and a long-term perspective.
Based on my own experience, the conclusion is clear: Turkey’s export challenge may appear to begin with the product, but it ultimately ends with perception. Products compete; perception wins. Without recognizing this reality, achieving a sustainable leap forward in exports will remain difficult.




